Culture-Specific Genders · 23 entries

Culture-Specific Genders

These are gender categories belonging to particular peoples and languages, and they are not translations of anything. Hijra is not the South Asian word for non-binary, Two-Spirit is a pan-Indigenous English term coined at a 1990 gathering in Winnipeg rather than an ancient one, and Bakla carries obligations and a standing in law that no English label carries. Each entry names the specific people or language community the word belongs to, never a continent, and says what the role involves rather than which Western category it approximates.

Where a community has published guidance on how it wishes to be described, the entry leads with that guidance instead of burying it in a footnote. Several of these categories were criminalised under colonial law and are documented mostly through the records of the people criminalising them, which is a fact about the sources rather than about the role, and the entries say which is which. Some are living, some are revived, some survive only in a written record. Bissu and Muxe are read very differently inside their own communities than in the anthropology written about them, and the entries hold both readings open.

Of this kind

All 23 culture-specific genders

23 entries

Keep going

The other kinds of term

Browse everything

Common questions

Questions about culture-specific genders

What is a third gender?

A recognised social category that is neither man nor woman within the culture that names it. The phrase is a comparative convenience rather than a shared identity: the roles it groups together have different histories, obligations and legal standings, and the entries describe each on its own terms rather than as versions of one another.

Are culture-specific genders the same as being non-binary?

No, and treating them as equivalent misdescribes both. A culture-specific category is a social role with its own history, community structures and often a place in religious or legal practice. Non-binary is an identity term from English-speaking gender vocabulary. A person may hold one, both or neither, and mapping one onto the other flattens what makes each documented.

Can anybody use these terms for themselves?

That depends on the term and on the community, and the catalogue records what the community has said rather than deciding for it. Two-spirit is explicitly not available to non-Indigenous people, and its entry leads with that. Where no such guidance exists, the entry says the record is silent instead of implying permission.

Why do so many entries describe colonial suppression?

Because it is what the sources document. Roles that had standing before colonisation were criminalised under imported law across South Asia, the Pacific and the Americas, and much of the surviving written record was produced by the administrations doing the criminalising. Each entry says who wrote the record it rests on, because that shapes what the record contains.