Gender Around the World · 23 entries

Gender Around the World

The largest group in the catalogue, and the one most readers arrive at by searching for a third gender. A term filed here does not describe an inner sense of gender. It describes a position inside a social system, with duties, a household, a place in ritual life and often a relationship with the law. Hijra is organised through a lineage of gurus and disciples and performs blessings at births and weddings. Fa'afafine is a role recognised by an extended family rather than declared against it. The literature is ethnography, colonial administration and court rulings, not psychology.

The filing rule is where the meaning lives. If a term answers the question of what somebody is inside themselves, it belongs elsewhere. If it answers the question of what position somebody holds among other people, it belongs here. That is also why the group resists a regional split: imposing a map of continents on categories that share a construction across thousands of miles of ocean, as the Pacific terms do, would separate the words that most belong together. What the group does hold in common is a warning. These are the entries most often flattened into a Western identity label, and almost every one of them has a translation note saying why that fails.

Emblem of the category

In this category

All 23 gender around the world

23 entries

Keep going

The other categories

See all 11 categories

Common questions

Questions about gender around the world

Why are these not filed as identities?

Because the sources describe a social position rather than an inner sense of self. A hijra household has a guru, an initiation and an economy; a fa'afafine has work inside an extended family. Those facts are the category, and an identity framing drops all of them while keeping only the part that resembles a Western label.

Is it right to call these third genders?

Sometimes, and it is a blunt instrument. The phrase is useful for signalling that a society recognises more than two positions, and it is misleading where a culture recognises five, as the Bugis of Sulawesi do, or where the category is not a third thing but a middle one, as with mahu.

Why keep the original spellings?

Because romanisation is where search fails people, and because the diacritics carry information. This catalogue files each term under its everyday romanised form, keeps the original script in its own field, and redirects the variant spellings, so that faafafine and fa'afafine both arrive in the same place.

Were these categories invented by colonialism?

No, but colonial administration reshaped almost all of them. The Criminal Tribes Act of 1871 registered hijras as criminals, missionary Christianity drove the Hawaiian mahu role underground from the 1820s, and several of the words in this group carry a period of use as insults before they were reclaimed.

Do people in these categories consider themselves transgender?

Some do and many do not, and the disagreement is often internal rather than about outsiders. The entries record it either way rather than resolving it, because the answer differs by person, by generation and by whether the question is being asked at home or in a diaspora.