Hand-set lists · 8 collections

Gender term collections

A category has a rule; a collection has an argument. These 8 sets are cut by hand across the 11 categories: the words with a known author and a dated first use, the categories that resist being translated into English at all, the umbrellas that have quietly absorbed the terms beneath them, and the sets that only make sense once somebody has said out loud what they are for.

Common questions

Questions about grouping gender terms

What a collection is, what separates it from a category, and what the sets deliberately leave out.

What is the difference between a category and a collection?

A category has a rule and a collection has an argument. Every entry files under exactly one of the 11 categories, decided by what the term names, and the category prints the rule for what belongs in it. A collection is set by hand, cuts across those categories, and exists because somebody had something to say that a filing rule cannot say.

Why group gender terms by where the word came from?

Because origin is the field every other glossary leaves out and the one that answers the most questions. A term coined in scholarship, a term that circulated in a community for decades before anybody wrote it down, and a term traceable to a dated post are three different kinds of evidence, and a reader deciding how much weight to put on a word wants to know which one they are holding. The field is descriptive and never a ranking: recency is not a verdict on anybody.

Why do some collections hold terms from one culture only?

Because a set that mixed them would be making the mistake it exists to correct. A culture-specific category is not a regional variant of an English word: it belongs to a particular people, has its own name in its own language, and often does not map onto the English categories at all. Grouping several of them together lets each entry say what does not translate, which is the most interesting sentence on most of those pages and the one a listicle always drops.

Can the same term appear in more than one collection?

Yes, and several do. A term can sit in one set because it has a named author and a dated first use, and in another because the umbrella above it has quietly absorbed it. The two sets make different arguments about the same entry, and the note attached to it says which argument it is there for. A category is exclusive; a collection is not.

Do the collections cover the whole catalogue?

No, and they are not meant to. 18 of the 82 entries appear in a set. A collection is deliberately incomplete and says what it leaves out, because a set that swept in every eligible entry would be a filter with a title on it. The complete list lives in the A–Z index and in browse.